Stimulus/Response Versus Input/Output Theory: An Orientation to the Syntax of Scientific Literature :: Biology Essays Research Papers

Stimulus/Response Versus Input/Output conjecture An Orientation to the Syntax of Scientific Literature There appears to be a steady desire within the scientific and lay community to justify events which occur in the universe in a concrete unquestioning fashion. This most likely extends from an unconscious (or conscious) need to control the world or so us. Such control can give a guts of protective cover regarding our future. If we can explain why events happen, we can attempt to look for when and for what campaign events will precipitate sometime in the future. Being able to predict the future leads to a greater feeling of security and control. However, it has been shown through decades of research that expressional events ar not predictable. Researchers tend to conclude that if they are to au whencetically understand behavior then they must be able to trail a system which allows them to forecast the occurrence of certain behavior patterns. Conversely, if they are unable to state consecutively when and why a pattern is presented then they have failed to understand the event. In order to retain a sense that the universe is orderly the unpredictable results are often explained through the slip of the experimenter, that adequate control was not kept over the experimental situation. through and through the Harvard Law of Animal Behavior (under carefully controlled experimental circumstances, an tool will behave as it damned well pleases.) these failed experiments are embodied into a succinct postulate which allows for the exploration of reason and desirability of such unpredictability (1). Through lectures, reading, and World Wide Web research through with(p) during the current semester I am moving from a stimulus/reaction theory to an input/ widening theory. The stimulus/response theory let experimenters believe that the unpredictable behaviors (responses) they had observed were due to inadequately controlled stimuli. An input/ production theory allows for, and seems to rest on, the fact that many behaviors originate from the internal (spontaneous) times of outputs. Internal origination is fundamental to many aspects of commonly observed behavior (biological clocks, innate endogenous rhythm, and other innate behaviors) and the presence of these behaviors seems to rest on something other then concrete stimuli from the external world. The syntax of many of the studies assemble on the Web leads me to conclude that these scientists are searching for an input/output behavioral system yet are unable to adequately put down such a clear relationship. This inability most likely stems from the recently discussed phenomena of bidirectionality within and outside the most broad input/output lash (Lecture, Bio 202).